Fundamentals of Resilient Design #4: Dramatically Better Building Envelopes

Posted by on Aug 27, 2012

Dan Whitmore’s Passive House under construction in Seattle makes use of very thick wall trusses that will hold about a foot of insulation. Photo: Dan Whitmore.

When most people think about resilience—resilience during a storm, for example—they think only about resilience during the event. How effectively will the building withstand strong winds or flooding?

Equally important, if not more important, is resilience in the aftermath of that event. Hurricanes, ice storms, blizzards, wildfires, tornadoes, and other natural disasters not only have an immediate impact, for which we may or may not be able to prepare, but they often have a much longer-term impact, especially through extended power outages, and those impacts may extend much further.

The same goes for terrorist actions; some suggest that smarter terrorists of the future may target our energy infrastructure or hack into power system controls to wreak havoc (cyberterrorism).

Maintaining livable conditions

In achieving resilience, one of our most important priorities is to ensure that our dwellings will maintain livable conditions in the event of extended power outages or interruptions in heating fuel. (I used to refer to this as “passive survivability,” but I came to realize that that term was too negative or dire-sounding to get much buy-in.) Here in Vermont, a resilient home is one that will maintain temperatures of at least 45 or 50 degrees Fahrenheit without supplemental heat.

The most important strategy for ensuring that those livable conditions will be maintained is by creating highly insulated building envelopes. I will cover other strategies, such as passive solar heat and solar electricity, in future blogs in this series. Below are the key strategies for achieving exceptionally good energy performance:

Insulate extremely well

We used to think that 2×6 walls insulated with fiberglass or cellulose were perfectly adequate relative to R-value—even defining that house as energy-efficient compared with standard construction (insulated 2×4 walls). It takes far more insulation to achieve the level of resilience needed to ensure that the house will maintain livable conditions without supplemental heat or electricity.

Building Science Corporation, of Westford, MA recommends the 10-20-40-60 rule-of-thumb for insulation levels in homes in cold climates (roughly defined as homes north of the Mason-Dixon Line). This rule of thumb refers to R-10 for basement sub-slab insulation, R-20 for foundation walls, R-40 for above-grade walls, and R-60 for ceilings or roofs. That’s a lot of insulation, compared to typical “energy-efficient” practice, which might include no insulation under a floor slab, R-5 to R-10 on foundation walls, R-19 in walls, and R-30 in attics.

Getting to these insulation levels is not easy. R-10 slab insulation requires two inches of extruded polystyrene or 2.5 inches of expanded polystyrene. R-20 foundation walls require four or five inches on the foundation exterior or an insulated 2×6 wall on the interior. R-40 walls can be achieved in several ways, such as double 2×4 walls held apart enough to achieve a ten-inch cavity and insulating with dense-pack cellulose; or insulating 2×6 studs with cellulose and then adding three inches of polyisocyanurate on the exterior. R-60 in an attic floor requires about 18 inches of cellulose.

For more on insulation materials (a lot more!), you might be interested in my recently published report: Insulation Materials: The BuildingGreen Guide to Products and Practices. It’s available as a downloadable PDF file for $129.

Install top-performing windows

This level of energy performance calls for windows that achieve a unit insulating value of R-5—that’s not the center-of-glass R-value, but the average R-value for the entire window, including edges and frame. National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) window energy performance labels list U-factor rather than R-value. (U-factor is the inverse of R-value.) Look for an NFRC-rated U-factor of 0.20 or lower.

To achieve such superb energy performance typically requires triple glazing (three layers of glass or two layers of glass and a suspended plastic film) and at least one, but sometimes two, low-emissivity (low-e) coatings and low-conductivity gas in the space between the layers of glass. You can find windows today with unit U-factors as low as 0.15 (R-6.7). Such windows aren’t cheap, but they are increasingly available, and they do a great job at keeping energy consumption down and ensuring comfort.

Very tight construction

Really well-insulated buildings should also be airtight. We don’t want uncontrolled air leakage bringing outside air in through the walls or basement; we want to be able to control where fresh air is brought in through a properly designed ventilation system. The Passive House certification program, which originated in Germany but is gaining traction worldwide, including in the U.S., requires airtightness of 0.6 air changes per hour at 50 pascals of pressure difference. (We measure air tightness using a “blower door” and often report that air tightness as an elevated pressure of 50 pascals.) I think a reasonable airtightness level for new construction is 1.0 air changes per hour at 50 pascals—not quite as tight as the Passive House standard.

In the event of loss of power so that the ventilation system stops operating, windows can be cracked to provide fresh air, but most of the time ventilation systems should be operated to ensure good air quality in the home.

New vs. existing homes

Achieving highly insulated building envelopes is much easier with new construction than with existing homes. To achieve such performance with an existing home requires what is often referred to as a “deep energy retrofit.”

My earlier version of this blog appeared on BuildingGreen.com as part of a series on resilience.

Alex is the founder of the Resilient Design Institute in Brattleboro, Vermont, as well as  BuildingGreen, Inc. and Environmental Building News. To keep up with his latest articles and musings, you can sign up for his Twitter feed.

No Comments

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Passive Solar Heating – A Key to Resilience | - [...] I discussed in my previous blog, a resilient home is extremely well-insulated, so that it can be kept warm…
  2. Fundamentals of Resilient Design #7: Renewable Energy Systems for Emergency Use | - [...] as where the house located, how well it can weather storms and flooding, and how effectively it retains heat…
  3. Fundamentals of Resilient Design #6: Natural Cooling | - [...] the sort of recommendations for insulation levels for resilient homes that were outlined in an earlier blog in this…
  4. San Francisco Names a Chief Resilience Officer | Resilient Design Institute - […] go a long way to ensuring that buildings will maintain habitable conditions should they lose power (passive survivability). Today,…
  5. In an Age of Climate Change, Passive Cooling Won’t be Enough | Resilient Design Institute - […] I’ve written about extensively on the RDI website and through BuildingGreen, including in this Fundamentals article and this 2006…
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers